← All articles

Healthtech

The healthcare data barrier is operational, not technical

The problem is not building the model. It is reaching the data: it lives in PDFs, in spreadsheets, or in systems nobody wants to touch.

When a Brazilian healthtech pitches a health plan or a hospital, the expectation is that the main challenge is the algorithm: predictive models, AI, accuracy. The reality is different. Even sophisticated health plans have a significant share of admissions without structured data. Reports live in open PDFs. Historical clinical decisions are locked inside closed medical records systems.

A phrase I heard in more than one conversation, from different sources: "the data is in PDFs at the health plans." It is not a lack of data. It is a lack of usable structure.

Three practical implications for anyone selling data solutions to healthcare in Brazil:

  1. Whoever solves the structured extraction bottleneck wins before whoever optimizes the model does. OCR, NER on medical reports, parsing badly formatted codes: the tedious work is where the value is.
  2. The startup that couples into the existing platform wins over the one that asks for a replacement. Health plans do not want to swap systems, they want to add capacity.
  3. The health plan buys savings with little work, not technology with a lot of work. If the pitch requires a six month IT project to get started, the pitch has already lost.

This holds true beyond healthcare, too: the pattern repeats in any sector with consolidated legacy systems (industry, agribusiness, government, large enterprises). The bottleneck is always operational before it is technical.

This pattern showed up in almost identical form in conversations with three different health plans throughout 2023 (Unimed VTRP, Unimed Caruaru, Pipo), while I was leading AI product at Huna. The most explicit phrasing came from VTRP: "medical records, the app, and dashboards are just a hassle to integrate."